Friday, March 03, 2006

Some thoughts on the Danes and on Danegeld

We have heard a great deal of talk about the Danish newspapers and the recent cartoons that have so upset many Muslims. We have also heard of endeavors by Muslims to attempt to impose Sharia on non-Muslim nations, with the threat of violence in the event that such nations do not stop "disrespecting" the Prophet Muhammad, or the religion of Islam.

We have also heard (though not through the mainstream media) that Danish Imams went to elaborate efforts to spread knowledge of the offending pictures, and even to manufacture additional pictures (which were far more offensive than the originals) in order to foment violence. As a consequence of this fomenting of violence and of fraud (I can find no better word than "fraud" to describe this deception), hundreds of people have been killed, largely Christians, and at least one martyr has been made as result of this fraud. Muslims are threatening more such violence, unless their will is respected.

What they are demanding is an end to freedom of speech, of the press, and even of thought. They are demanding that we censor ourselves so as not to say things which would offend them. What they are threatening is more violence if their will is not followed.

There are many words which can describe this course of action. I find that the word which best describes that course of action is Danegeld. Wikipedia has rather simply and eloquently defined Danegeld as follows:

The Danegeld was an English tribute raised to pay off Viking raiders (usually led by the Danish king) to save the land from being ravaged by the raiders.

Danegeld was continued later under the name tallage. The term has come to mean protection money, or any coercive payment.


While it is true that the Muslims in question are not asking for the coin of money, they are asking for a more precious coin: our freedom. Some, who do not value that coin, are more than willing to pay it, simply to prevent more violence from occuring. Others (and I am in that number) are not willing to pay that coin, at any price. Certainly, the Danes, who have been the recipients of Danegeld in centuries past, have at least learned from their own history, and their Queen has rightly commended her country to resist the payment of this tribute to fear.

While I am willing to pay respect to the religion of Islam (for there is much in Islam worthy of respect), such payment can only be reciprocal: respect must be earned. The actions taken by many Muslims in rioting, in killing, and in martyring, have earned only the world's scorn. If such people seek respect, they must first earn it. So far, they have not done so.

In closing, I think that the counsel of Rudyard Kipling is well worth following. I give you that counsel as follows:

Danegeld


It is always a temptation to an armed and agile nation
To call upon a neighbour and to say: --
"We invaded you last night--we are quite prepared to fight,
Unless you pay us cash to go away."

And that is called asking for Dane-geld,
And the people who ask it explain
That you've only to pay 'em the Dane-geld
And then you'll get rid of the Dane!

It is always a temptation for a rich and lazy nation,
To puff and look important and to say: --
"Though we know we should defeat you, we have not the time to meet you.
We will therefore pay you cash to go away."

And that is called paying the Dane-geld;
But we've proved it again and again,
That if once you have paid him the Dane-geld
You never get rid of the Dane.

It is wrong to put temptation in the path of any nation,
For fear they should succumb and go astray;
So when you are requested to pay up or be molested,
You will find it better policy to say: --

"We never pay any-one Dane-geld,
No matter how trifling the cost;
For the end of that game is oppression and shame,
And the nation that pays it is lost!"

3 Comments:

Blogger Dad29 said...

Ummnnnhhhh....

Let's for a moment forget the "demonstrations" and murders perpetrated by rabble-rousing jackasses posing as "holy men," and go back to the cartoons.

If you look at John Hardon (SJ)'s catechism, you will find that in his essays on the 8th Commandment, he clearly and unambiguously opposes "offensive propaganda," under which I think these cartoons fall.

Further, TAquinas proposes that discretion is a necessary part of the virtue of prudence.

We are dealing with a situation comparable to using the "N" word in reference to Martin L King. This is not "freedom of speech" under any definition contemplated by the Founders of the US.

We are dealing with a natural moral law, which supercedes "rights" invented during the Lutheran/French Revolution.

10:40 AM  
Blogger Bernard Brandt said...

I have waited for several days to see if there would be any response to your comment. As there is so far none, I will respond.

I will agree with you that with rights come duties, obligations, and responsibilities (see for example the RC Code of Canon Law, hardly a Lutheran/French Revolutionary text, which details both rights and obligations of all of Christ's faithful and for clergy). As an example of that bonding of rights and responsibilities, if one were to use the "N" word publicly, one should be willing to take the considerable flack associated with such use. The same can be said as regards disparaging remarks towards other religions, including Islam.

Nonetheless, contrary to Shari'a law, I do not believe that such "flack" should include a formal or informal death penalty, or fatwa, such as those sentenced or executed upon Salman Rushdie, Theo van Gogh, or the Danish cartoonists.

In short, while I agree with you that people should be responsible for the consequences of their stupidity, I do not believe that such criminal stupidity should be punishable by death.

8:01 AM  
Blogger Deacon Jim said...

I think the point of your posting was to highlight the fact that people - most especially Christians, cannot be subjugated by threats and bribery (we won't kill you as long as you don't offend us cuts a pretty wide swath).

Respect for those who follow Muhammed's way must be earned.

When I posted about the Dubai ports deal I noted that should the Emir stand up and say – ‘Hey look it's us. We're responsible for terrorism. We are guilty and we must change that. It is not Israel, the United States, or Christianity’, then I'd believe a first step toward respect had been made. As long as the Muslims stand and blame freedom, Jews, Christians, the West for the very evil they carry out - well no respect earned and none given.

And I won't be held hostage because they are crazy enough to take and kill hostages either.

9:52 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home